Manhattan Beach

Manhattan Beach
By:Jennifer Egan
Published on 2017-10-03 by Simon and Schuster


NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • NEW YORK’S “ONE BOOK, ONE NEW YORK” PICK Winner of the Andrew Carnegie Medal for Excellence in Fiction The daring and magnificent novel from the Pulitzer Prize–winning author. Named One of the Best Books of the Year by NPR, Esquire, Vogue, The Washington Post, The Guardian, USA TODAY, Time • A New York Times Notable Book Anna Kerrigan, nearly twelve years old, accompanies her father to visit Dexter Styles, a man who, she gleans, is crucial to the survival of her father and her family. She is mesmerized by the sea beyond the house and by some charged mystery between the two men. \u200eYears later, her father has disappeared and the country is at war. Anna works at the Brooklyn Naval Yard, where women are allowed to hold jobs that once belonged to men, now soldiers abroad. She becomes the first female diver, the most dangerous and exclusive of occupations, repairing the ships that will help America win the war. One evening at a nightclub, she meets Dexter Styles again, and begins to understand the complexity of her father’s life, the reasons he might have vanished. “A magnificent achievement, at once a suspenseful noir intrigue and a transporting work of lyrical beauty and emotional heft” (The Boston Globe), “Egan’s first foray into historical fiction makes you forget you’re reading historical fiction at all” (Elle). Manhattan Beach takes us into a world populated by gangsters, sailors, divers, bankers, and union men in a dazzling, propulsive exploration of a transformative moment in the lives and identities of women and men, of America and the world.

This Book was ranked at 4 by Google Books for keyword Beach.

Book ID of Manhattan Beach's Books is yLCEDgAAQBAJ, Book which was written byJennifer Eganhave ETAG "Yw3i1z+10bM"

Book which was published by Simon and Schuster since 2017-10-03 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781476716756 and ISBN 10 Code is 1476716757

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "448 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryFiction

This Book was rated by 44 Raters and have average rate at "3.5"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is true

Book Preview



Don't you type of hate how we have joined the decadent phase of Goodreads whereby possibly fifty percent (or more) of the reviews written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually naked and unabashed in their variously powerful attempts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of wood (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoke Don't you type of hate how we have joined the decadent phase of Goodreads whereby possibly fifty per cent (or more) of the evaluations compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually bare and unabashed inside their variously efficient efforts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of pine (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were evenly plainspoken, just utilitarian, unpretentious, and -- above all otherwise -- dull, dull, boring? Do not you kind of hate when persons state'do not you think this way or feel this way'in an endeavor to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically into accepting with them? In the words of ABBA: I really do, I actually do, I do(, I do, I do). Well, because the interwebs is a earth by which yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with today's (and with fetish porn), we can review yesteryear in its inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at the very least till this amazing site finally tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in their entirety. I've destined it with much string and pulled it here for the perusal. (Please understand that many a sic are implied in the next reviews.) their really complicated and silly! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the very least that guide is good! There you have it. Refreshingly, not really a review published in one of the witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Only a primal yell unleashed in to the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teenager, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and a quality that renders his convictions much more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's overview of the exact same play. You could'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in so it implies he designs problems... that will be the case, for many I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you don't want to see is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks in the first place, if it was designed to be read, then it will be a novel, not really a play. On top of that the teach had us students see the play aloud (on person for every single character for a couple pages). None folks had read the play before. None of us wanted to learn it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared to be they weren't paying attention. All of this compounded to create me more or less hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also really can fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to read a play then you definitely have sinned and are likely to hell, in the event that you believe in hell. Or even, you're planning to the DMV. I am also tired of all you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of an email overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age once we are taught to respect each other's differences, this indicates offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow to your small linguistic rules. Creative phrase will cost-free alone irrespective of how you attempt so that you can shackle it. That is definitely your current cue, Aubrey. Around the viewpoint, this engage in Macbeth appeared to be your worste peice possibly compiled by Shakespeare, and this also says a reasonable amount considering in addition, i read through his Romeo and Juliet. Ontop regarding it can be presently amazing piece, impractical personas plus absolutly discusting group of ethics, Shakespeare overtly shows Lovely lady Macbeth as being the accurate vilian inside play. Thinking of nancy mearly the particular words with the back circular as well as Macbeth themselves is usually truely carrying out your ugly criminal offenses, such as homicide as well as scam, I wouldn't understand why it's so easy to believe this Macbeth would be ready to perform excellent as opposed to nasty only if his / her girl have been more possitive. I believe that your perform is actually uterally unrealistic. Although the examples below is certainly this ne as well as extra associated with basic publication reviewing. Though succinct and also with virtually no drawing attention propensity to be able to coyness or cuteness, Jo's examine alludes with a animosity consequently profound that must be inexpressible. One particular imagines a handful of Signet Typical Designs compromised to portions by using pruning shears throughout Jo's vicinity. I hate this play. So much so this I can not sometimes give you every analogies or similes in respect of the amount My partner and i dislike it. A strong incrementally snarkier form will often have mentioned anything like...'I personally don't like this engage in such as a simile Could not occur with.' Certainly not Jo. The lady addresses the uncooked, undecorated fact unhealthy intended for figurative language. And there's certainly no problem using that. After inside an excellent even though, when you invest in neck-deep throughout dandified pomo hijinks, it truly is a great wallow from the pig compose you happen to be itchin'for. Appreciate it, Jo. I adore both you and your useless clasping in similes that are not able to tactic the actual bilious hate in the heart. That you are mine, and I will be yours. Figuratively communicating, regarding course. And from now on here is my assessment: Macbeth by way of Bill Shakespeare is the better literary work inside the English language language, and anybody who disagrees is surely an asshole along with a dumbhead.

Comments