At the Beach

At the Beach
By:Danna Swartz
Published on 2006 by Barrons Juveniles

Duck's day at the beach comes in the form of a padded cloth book with a sturdy zipper, a handle, and a flap. When closed tight, the book is transformed into a small carrying case. When toddlers lift the flap, they see the sun shining down on the duck as he plays in the sand. Unzip the case, open the pages, and kids will discover Duck's summer cottage, a tiny detachable beach bag, and a cloth trunk holding beach playthings. Outside on the beach they'll find a souvenir stand—and every scene includes padded cloth beach items attached to pages with Velcro tabs, or moved from one page to the next as Duck enjoys his day at the beach.

This Book was ranked at 23 by Google Books for keyword Beach.

Book ID of At the Beach's Books is QpnGPQAACAAJ, Book which was written byDanna Swartzhave ETAG "Am3CrakMEb8"

Book which was published by Barrons Juveniles since 2006 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9780764179235 and ISBN 10 Code is 0764179233

Reading Mode in Text Status is false and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "6 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryJuvenile Fiction

This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is false

Book Preview

Do not you type of loathe how we have entered the decadent phase of Goodreads wherein probably fifty percent (or more) of the evaluations compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually nude and unabashed inside their variously powerful attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoke Do not you kind of loathe how we have joined the decadent phase of Goodreads wherein probably fifty % (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed within their variously powerful efforts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were uniformly plainspoken, only practical, unpretentious, and -- above all else -- dull, dull, boring? Do not you type of hate when people say'do not you think in this manner or sense that way'in an endeavor to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically into agreeing using them? In what of ABBA: I actually do, I really do, I do(, I really do, I do). Effectively, because the interwebs is just a earth by which days gone by stands shoulder-to-shoulder with today's (and with fetish porn), we could revisit yesteryear in their inviolable presentness any time we wish. Or at least until this amazing site ultimately tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in their entirety. I've destined it with much rope and drawn it here for the perusal. (Please realize that several a sic are intended in the following reviews.) their really difficult and ridiculous! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at least that guide is excellent! There you've it. Refreshingly, not a review published in among the witch's comments or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Merely a primal scream unleashed to the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) an adolescent, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and a clarity that renders his convictions much more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the exact same play. You could'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies he designs problems... that will be the case, for all I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you don't want to read is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks in the first place, if it had been supposed to be read, then it would have been a novel, not really a play. On top of that the teach had us students see the play aloud (on person for every single character for a few pages). None folks had read the play before. None folks wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. This compounded to make me pretty much hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And yes it can actually fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to see a play you then have sinned and are going to hell, if you rely on hell. Or even, you're likely to the DMV. I'm also fed up with all you could smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists together with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of an email overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age once we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow to the petty linguistic rules. Imaginative phrase will absolutely free itself regardless how you are attempting for you to shackle it. That is certainly ones stick, Aubrey. In my personal impression, the enjoy Macbeth appeared to be a worste peice ever created by Shakespeare, and also this is saying a lot thinking about furthermore examine his or her Romeo along with Juliet. Ontop regarding it's presently fabulous plot, improbable heroes along with absolutly discusting pair of ethics, Shakespeare freely portrays Lady Macbeth for the reason that legitimate vilian within the play. Looking at she's mearly the speech with the back around plus Macbeth him self is definitely truely committing this ugly crimes, which include murder as well as scam, I wouldn't realise why it is so quick to imagine in which Macbeth would certainly be inclined to undertake good rather than malignant if perhaps his / her better half ended up additional possitive. I really believe that it have fun with is uterally unrealistic. However the following is your ne furthermore really involving vintage book reviewing. Although succinct in addition to without any unproductive desire to help coyness or even cuteness, Jo's examine alludes to some resentment therefore serious that it's inexpressible. A single imagines a couple of Signet Typical Designs compromised to help chunks by using pruning shears inside Jo's vicinity. I don't really like this particular play. It's in which I can't sometimes provide you with almost any analogies or similes concerning what amount I personally dislike it. A great incrementally snarkier style could have reported one thing like...'I hate this kind of play similar to a simile I won't occur with.' Not really Jo. Your woman addresses some sort of raw, undecorated truth of the matter unhealthy regarding figurative language. And also there is nothing wrong by using that. After throughout an excellent while, once you get neck-deep inside dandified pomo hijinks, it is really a pleasant wallow inside the hog dog pen you're itchin'for. Many thanks, Jo. Everyone loves you and your in vain clasping on similes that won't be able to technique the actual bilious hate as part of your heart. You might be my own, and We are yours. Figuratively communicating, of course. Now here is my personal critique: Macbeth through Bill Shakespeare is a good fictional function within the Language dialect, plus anyone who disagrees can be an asshole along with a dumbhead.