At the Beach

At the Beach
By:Anne Rockwell
Published on 2014-06-10 by Simon and Schuster

A young girl spends a radiant summer day at the beach in this updated classic from the author of Apples and Pumpkins. Sun...sand...the bright blue ocean! There is so much for a young girl to do on a visit to the beach: sand castles to build, seashells to gather, sandpipers to run with, and a picnic lunch to enjoy. This updated edition of a perennial summertime favorite includes new jacket art from Lizzy Rockwell and refreshed interior art and design.

This Book was ranked at 17 by Google Books for keyword Beach.

Book ID of At the Beach's Books is LaUyAQAAQBAJ, Book which was written byAnne Rockwellhave ETAG "sP5XPRHSmgk"

Book which was published by Simon and Schuster since 2014-06-10 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781481414012 and ISBN 10 Code is 1481414011

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "24 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryJuvenile Fiction

This Book was rated by 1 Raters and have average rate at "4.0"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is true and in ePub is true

Book Preview

Do not you sort of loathe how we've entered the decadent phase of Goodreads where possibly fifty per cent (or more) of the evaluations published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually naked and unabashed within their variously effective attempts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you type of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were consistently plainspoke Do not you type of hate how we've entered the decadent phase of Goodreads where perhaps fifty per cent (or more) of the evaluations compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually nude and unabashed within their variously powerful efforts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you kind of wood (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoken, simply functional, unpretentious, and -- especially else -- boring, boring, dull? Do not you type of loathe when persons state'do not you believe in this way or sense this way'in an endeavor to goad you both psychologically and grammatically in to agreeing with them? In the language of ABBA: I actually do, I actually do, I do(, I do, I do). Effectively, as the interwebs is a world by which days gone by stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we are able to revisit the past in their inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at the least until this site eventually tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in its entirety. I have destined it with huge rope and drawn it here for the perusal. (Please recognize that several a sic are intended in the next reviews.) its actually complicated and foolish! why cant we be reading like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the very least that book is good! There you have it. Refreshingly, not really a evaluation published in one of the witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal yell unleashed to the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) an adolescent, but I admire his power to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the same play. You might'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in so it implies that he designs problems... which can be the case, for many I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to learn is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it was meant to be read, then it would be a novel, not just a play. On top of that the teach had us students see the play aloud (on person for every single character for a couple pages). None folks had see the play before. None people wanted to learn it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. This compounded to create me virtually hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. Plus it can definitely fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to read a play then you have sinned and are likely to hell, if you believe in hell. If not, you're going to the DMV. I am also fed up with whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists along with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age once we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to anticipate others tokowtow to the petty linguistic rules. Artistic manifestation can cost-free themselves regardless of how you are probably trying to shackle it. That's the cue, Aubrey. Around my personal judgment, the have fun with Macbeth has been a worste peice possibly written by Shakespeare, and this says a lot thinking about furthermore examine his Romeo and also Juliet. Ontop with it can be by now fantastic story, impracticable people and absolutly discusting pair of ethics, Shakespeare openly portrays Sweetheart Macbeth as the genuine vilian within the play. Looking at she's mearly the express with your back round and also Macbeth themself is actually truely carrying out your hideous crimes, which include hard and deception, I really don't realize why it is so straightforward to visualize in which Macbeth would likely be inclined to complete superior as opposed to bad doubts his spouse ended up being more possitive. I do believe this have fun with is uterally unrealistic. Nevertheless the next is definitely a ne in addition really regarding classic ebook reviewing. Although succinct plus without any distracting propensity to coyness and also cuteness, Jo's review alludes to the animosity and so outstanding it is inexpressible. A single imagines a handful of Signet Typical Updates broken into to help pieces by using pruning shears in Jo's vicinity. I don't really like this specific play. So much so that will I am unable to sometimes offer you virtually any analogies or perhaps similes with regards to simply how much My partner and i hate it. A strong incrementally snarkier style might have claimed a thing like...'I hate this specific have fun with being a simile I won't arise with.' Not necessarily Jo. Your woman talks a new raw, undecorated truth unfit for figurative language. Along with there is no problem together with that. When around an excellent even though, when you buy neck-deep around dandified pomo hijinks, it is really a pleasant wallow inside the pig pencil that you are itchin'for. Appreciate it, Jo. I love you and the useless greedy in similes which are not able to tactic the particular bilious hatred with your heart. You are my verizon prepaid phone, and also I will be yours. Figuratively speaking, involving course. Now and here is the evaluate: Macbeth by means of William Shakespeare is best literary function inside the Language dialect, and anybody who disagrees is definitely an asshole including a dumbhead.